Ancient Greece. Theseus (Henry Cavill), a heroic but mortal man is chosen by Zeus (Luke Evans) to lead the fight against King Hyperion (Mickey Rourke), who is searching for the Epirus Bow in order to be able to unleash the Titans, held bound in the base of Mount Tartarus.

*****

Tarsem Singh is undoubtedly a director of great visual invention, but the question remains as to whether he can alloy that creative eye to a coherent story. Immortals, his third feature as director after a background in advertising, leaves that question a little up in the air, though he undoubtedly presents a more cohesive narrative than he has in the past. Although Tarsem seems far more preoccupied with dizzying set pieces, production design, costumes and background, the story does at least make sense, even if you have to pay more attention than you would normally expect to have to for a film of this type.

It is easy to dismiss Immortals as all style and no substance and despite the elements of revenge, destiny, identity and hatred being given far shorter shrift than in something like Gladiator, it is by no means a wholly superficial film. Henry Cavill seems a little out of his depth when the more hefty dramatic and emotional scenes come along and Mickey Rourke seems content to mumble, chew the scenery and look absurd in a weird clawed cowl, but the fight scenes make sense, the CGI does not leave the action seeming weightless and although there is a lot of green screen, it is not as extensive as in 300 and so there is good sense of time and place to most of the set pieces.

All of this is not to say that the film is without its detraction of course. A supposedly stirring speech by Theseus towards the end falls flat, more Orlando Bloom in Kingdom of Heaven than Gerard Butler in 300, too many of the set pieces are truncated when they should be given room to breathe and it is rarely entirely clear who is who atop Mount Olympus. The film suffers, as suggested earlier, from the director’s pre-occupation with the look of the film, when more attention should have been given to characterisation, though it is clear from our forthcoming interview with Greg Bryk (who plays the supporting character of The Monk) that this was attributable in part to the studio heads, who were no doubt keen on the current vogue for rapid-fire editing and visual spectacle over engaging story-telling. Bryk suggests that a far better, longer director’s cut lies in here somewhere and it is tempting to agree.

Not a failure or a bad film by any means, but beset by Tarsem Singh’s historical shortcomings, which he will need to address with the upcoming Mirror Mirror.

[Rating:3/5]

Extras: “It’s no myth” documentary, looking at the roots of Greek myth and legend, an alternate opening scene, two alternate endings and a number of deleted scenes (all rightly so). For the Blu-ray, there will also be a selection of stills from the Immortals Comic Book (Gods & Heroes) and a number of featurettes looking at fighting training, the director’s vision, the score and other elements.

[Rating:2/5]

[yframe url=’http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSmJ5UXtUnk’]

Previous articleGwyneth Paltrow, Reese Witherspoon & More Join Ryan Murphy’s One Hit Wonders
Next articleWatch the First Five Minutes of Sean Bean’s ‘Cleanskin’
Dave has been writing for HeyUGuys since mid-2010 and has found them to be the most intelligent, friendly, erudite and insightful bunch of film fans you could hope to work with. He's gone from ham-fisted attempts at writing the news to interviewing Lawrence Bender, Renny Harlin and Julian Glover, to writing articles about things he loves that people have actually read. He has fairly broad tastes as far as films are concerned, though given the choice he's likely to go for Con Air over Battleship Potemkin most days. He's pretty sure that 2001: A Space Odyssey is the most overrated mess in cinematic history.