Home News Unlawful Kill...

Unlawful Killing Trailer – Princess Diana Documentary Set to Cause Controversy at Cannes

18

This week, the 64th Cannes International Film Festival kicks off and you’ll no doubt see more trailers and posters for movies screening there as the week progresses. One such movie is ‘Unlawful Killing’ a documentary directed by Keith Allen looking in depth at the death of Princess Diana on the year that she would mark her 50th birthday.

This no doubt controversial documentary is set to screen on Friday 13th May in Cannes – mixes candid interviews with recreations of some of the key moments from the official inquest. The questions the film asks, as it seeks to uncover the truth about the world’s most famous car crash, could shake the public’s perceptions of how Diana and her partner Dodi Fayed died – and where responsibility ultimately lies for this apparent Establishment cover-up perpetrated by “Dark Forces”.

Below is the trailer for the documentary which shows interviews with some of Diana’s friends and you can make of it what you will. I guess the title in itself suggests what sort of angle the makers of the movie will take.

You can find out more on the official website.

Personally I’m not sure what to think. I don’t really like the way the trailer opens like a horror movie but would value your opinions. Check out the trailer below and let us know your thoughts in the comments section below:

18 COMMENTS

  1. This documentary is a pack of lies. Diana was killed by a drunk driver, high on drugs, who was driving too fast and smashed straight into a concrete pillar. Keith Allen is ignorant beyond the realms of stupidity – the ultimate fool – to believe in conspiracy theories.

  2. This documentary is a pack of lies. Diana was killed by a drunk driver, high on drugs, who was driving too fast and smashed straight into a concrete pillar. Keith Allen is ignorant beyond the realms of stupidity – the ultimate fool – to believe in conspiracy theories.

  3. It is a horror movie. And it’s probably true. Very sad and more than past time that someone brought this to the public at large. Good luck to Allen and all who helped with his film.

  4. Totally agree with you Roger, what do they think , that Diana was imortal and nothing couldnt happen to her , really now, just like every other human on earth will die at sometime so this was her time it was just her time.

  5. Both of you are like little sheep willing to believe anything your governments or any other government tells you is true. Look at the facts, there are too many to ignore. Just a coincidence that Diana warned a friend of her death in the same manner that it happens? I think not! You should really research the facts from all sources before jumping to a conclusion.

  6. Both of you are like little sheep willing to believe anything your governments or any other government tells you is true. Look at the facts, there are too many to ignore. Just a coincidence that Diana warned a friend of her death in the same manner that it happens? I think not! You should really research the facts from all sources before jumping to a conclusion.

  7. Well, looks like you guys and gals above have done a lot of your own research; .

    The whole incident is very fishy and just like 9/11, if there is nothing suspicious about it and it was a genuine accident, why not have a full and open investigation/post mortem or whatever. Surely then we would all believe there is nothing to hide…

  8. Oops! I meant “below”.

    I’ve never doubted she was “dun in” and I’d love soembody to prove she wasn’t!

  9. Don’t think so – personally heard about the crash on the radio – news flash at 2.30 a.m., TV footage of Di walking from car after that – seen by many people until 4.00 a.m. & never seen again & initial radio broadcasts also disappeared (& reporting journalists sacked etc., etc….)
    Strange how so much evidence was lost – inefficiency rules maybe?
    Don’t believe Henri Paul, the driver, was drunk either
    What re bodyguard ? (Trevor Rhyce(SP) Jones) Alive, in front seat, but never made a statement publically since…)
    Oh for your simple explanation Roger…
    Doubt we’ll ever find out the truth though

  10. You don’t believe in conspiracy theories; perhaps you could explain why all the camera’s in the tunnel were either switched off or not working.

  11. why, because She was using the fame to help others. Just think, who else kissing a mortaly sick child and going on the landmine??????????????

  12. Roger, were you there? No I don’t think so so don’t opinionate on what others believe after their own assessment of the fact obtained by alternative means! I can assure you from personal experience that the Ministry of Dildoes do kill people to order and again from personal experience that large Corporations do employ hitmen to get rid of any possible embarrassment! There is absolutely no conspiracy theory there these are facts!

  13. Just her time according to interested parties in the UK establishment and Royal Family – don’t forget that against all the odds of a biased chairman who did not ensure that all the evidence was disclosed and indeed illegally instructed the Jury to discard certain facts, as well as the failure of the disclosure of evidence and the exclusion of 143 witnesses – they still declared unlawful killing! Do you or Roger (plants) really think that the Jury was wrong? Well guess what! – according to the law that is the official decision and your attempts at discreditation is absolutely pointless! Who coerced you into opining on matters where you cannot qualify your opinion as neither of you have not really researched the subject matter?

  14. Just her time according to interested parties in the UK establishment and Royal Family – don’t forget that against all the odds of a biased chairman who did not ensure that all the evidence was disclosed and indeed illegally instructed the Jury to discard certain facts, as well as the failure of the disclosure of evidence and the exclusion of 143 witnesses – they still declared unlawful killing! Do you or Roger (plants) really think that the Jury was wrong? Well guess what! – according to the law that is the official decision and your attempts at discreditation is absolutely pointless! Who coerced you into opining on matters where you cannot qualify your opinion as neither of you have not really researched the subject matter?

  15. Quite right there is a number of missing witnesses including the English woman who saw the tunnel access/exit road being blocked or the London Lawyer who saw two vehicles escaping the scene at high speed from his Hotel window around the corner and of these two vehicles one was a smaller white vehicle!

  16. Jim McCracken knows what he is talking about as he has had the
    personal experience he states he has had.  Princess Diana, Dodi, and Henri Paul
    were assassinated.  I have been researching this now for over thirteen years. Do
    your own research.  If there was nothing to hide the inquest would NOT have
    taken ten years to occur.  Then when the inquest finally starts with a jury of
    ordinary British people, the coroner charges the jury to only return certain
    verdicts.  Stacks of evidence disappeared such as Prince Philip’s letters to
    Princess Diana.  These letters were in police custody and they just mysteriously
    disappeared as did the French dossier which contained thousands of pages and
    photographs.  If there were nothing incrimanating in any of these, then there
    would be no reason for them to suddenly vanish.   One hundred forty-three vital witnesses were ignored by both the Paget investigation and the official inquest.

    On 16 June 2000 shorty after midnight, one week after James Andanson’s death was made public, the Sipa photo agency in Paris which James Andanson worked for was broken into by armed, masked gunmen who dismantled the security cameras and computer hard drives, cameras, computer disks, and computers were taken.  These armed men knew exactly where to look as specific offices were entered and they spent three hours in the Sipa agency.  The employees who were held hostage stated that the three men were never concerned about the police showing up despite the fact that a security guard was shot in the foot.  The employees of the Sipa photo agency felt that these three “burglars” were actually members of the French security services.  The month previous, May 2000, four hundred miles from his home on a French army base, James Andanson was discovered burnt to a crisp inside his car and the car keys were nowhere to be found and his skull had a not just one bullet hole but two bullet holes.James Andanson bragged about being in the Pont d’Alma tunnel the early hours of 31 August 1997 and he was planning to publish the photographs he had snapped in the Pont d’Alma tunnel during those early hours.  He had asked his friend, Frederic Dard, who was France’s best crime novelist, to write the text for the book.  This is the reason that the Sipa photo agency was “burglarised”.  Whatever and whoever were snapped in those photographs by James Andanson were never to see the light of day.  This is also the reason why James Andanson was murdered.  He bragged about being in the Pont d’Alma tunnel and he braggged about the photographs he had taken in those early hours.  The man who opened his camera shutter should have been smart and kept his cake hole shut.
     

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Exit mobile version