Home Features The Fall or R...

The Fall or Rise of Richard Kelly?

8

donnie1

In 2001, Richard Kelly’s Donnie Darko opened in theatres. With only a limited release, just 58 screens across the US it wasn’t able to set the box office alight, with a domestic gross of around $520,000, and $4.1M worldwide. When it came to DVD, however, it found a new lease of life. With some interesting extras on the disc, and the release of The Donnie Darko book which included pages from ‘The Philosophy of Time Travel’, we could delve deeper into the mythos of the movie.

 Word spread, DVD’s began to fly off the shelves, and people found a place in their hearts for Kelly’s masterpiece. It provoked discussion, it divided opinions. Most of all, it made people think. Donnie Darko became a cult classic, it made a star of lead actor Jake Gyllenhall, and it catapulted it’s talented director into the public consciousness. Donnie Darko was Kelly’s first feature. He had made Darko on a low budget of less than $5m, and it was the story and thought provoking narrative that made Darko such a popular film.

 The eventual success of the movie meant that Kelly was afforded a higher budget for his highly anticipated follow up, around $17M. Southland Tales was to be an epic story, with some big names attached. Casting and early details about the plot raised some eyebrows. An ex-wrestler, a pop star and Buffy the Vampire Slayer in a tale about an apocalypse, and the end of the world? Trust was put in Kelly by his fans however, after all, Donnie Darko wouldn’t have looked so hot on paper either.

 The movie debuted to an icy reception at the Cannes Film Festival. Following rumours of re-shoots and extensive re-editing, Southland Tales was heavily delayed. A graphic novel series meant to lead in to it’s release was reduced in size, due to Kelly’s struggles with the film. Any name value Kelly had with mainstream movie goers was gone, and it was only the internet fans still waiting for Kelly’s epic. Eventually, Southland was given a very limited release, at just 63 theatres, and grossed just $366,000 worldwide.

 Kelly didn’t get to make the movie he wanted. His real vision had been for a four hour epic, a dream that inevitably had to be compromised. Would Southland Tales have been a better movie if Kelly had had his way? Possibly not. Southland was intrinsically flawed, an over indulgent, over ambitious hodge podge of great ideas and poor execution. Unfortunately, unlike Donnie Darko, Southland did not get a new lease of life on DVD either. There was really not much positive buzz about it even from a lot of the directors staunchest fans.

 Kelly acquiesced to the Hollywood system for his third film, and opted for a more mainstream studio picture. Moreover, his movie The Box would not be based on one of his own original ideas, but on the Richard Matheson shoort story Button, Button. He was compromising his creative vision for a fair budget, and a nationwide theatrical release. The source material was however open to interpretation, and the director was able to put his own creative spin and unique ideas to the story. With a couple of A-list, though not overly expensive stars, The Box was a very conservative project in contrast to his last movie.

 Kelly is a very talented film maker, and internet movie fans were looking forward to his next work. The problem is, the general public, the cinema patrons that push a good opening up to a big opening, don’t know who Kelly is. With limited theatrical runs for Darko and Tales, he has never really hit the headlines. Coupled with the lack of real star power in the movie, and a cerebral storyline that is difficult to convey in a trailer, it was always going to struggle at the box office. And it has, having made just $13.5M in it’s first two weeks, against a production budget of $30M. Worldwide, it will make a profit by the end of it’s run, but only a small one.

 Kelly continues to complement his movies with extra content, in the case of The Box it’s another book, that features in the movie, and is available online. His movies work best backed up by internet material, and insider information. That’s why the failure of Southland Tales and The Box might not necessarily be a bad thing, for fans of the film maker at least. Tales was over indulgent, The Box too much of a compromise. Kelly’s films, his stories and ideas, are just not meant for mainstream audiences.

 If he is forced to go back to basics, with a low budget film and intelligent storyline, it may result in another great film like Donnie Darko. With his ambitions reigned in, and no studio execs looking over his shoulder, Kelly could once again show what a great artist he is. It’s most director’s dream to be able to make the films they want with the financial backing and clout of a major hollywood studio. But the truth is, Kelly is an auteur, and much better off working completely independently. I’m looking forward to his next project, whatever it may be, as it may just be the best film he ever makes.

 

Bazmann – You can now follow me on Twitter at www.twitter.com/baz_mann

8 COMMENTS

  1. […] is the original post: The Fall or Rise of Richard Kelly? : HeyUGuys By admin | category: dream movies | tags: almost-documentary, daniels, deeply-buried, […]

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by HeyUGuys Movie News and Barry Steele, Gary Phillips. Gary Phillips said: RT @heyuguysblog The Fall or Rise of Richard Kelly? : HeyUGuys http://bit.ly/Bhgsf […]

  3. interesting comments. but i feel tales and the box were both fantastic and original and thought provoking. its a shame the majority of audiences and critics don't feel the same way.

  4. I have to admit, i have'nt been able to see The Box yet, which is why i did'nt offer an opinion on it. You're entitled to your opinion on Southland Tales, which is just as valid as mine, but i thought it was an unwatchable mess, a victim of too much editing and compromise.

  5. The box sucked big time! And do not buy the argument that this movie is for people with brain. It is a “king withou clothes”. It is pretentious and I dare to say condescending to the audience. This movie is a flop! How on Earth did he get 30 mln??? One could not help but wonder where these monies could have been spent instead of pissing off general public and his former fans (me included)

  6. Grisha – We also thought The Box was a disappointment, but didn't you think that it's a good sign that the studios are giving Directors like Kelly – with a unique capability – that sort of money, and distribution? I agree The Box won't serve him well but surely it's better to have a film that tries to be different from the hundreds of movie-by-numbers?

  7. Well, Kelly's does not represent anything, there are tons of people out there 10 times more talented and 20 times more humble and they do not get any money or distribution. The Moon for example, have you seen it? It was so-o- good, yet it only played in 252 theatres (2635 for the box). Kelly just knows how to schmooze with right people, that is how he got 30 mln and produced big nothing! I would even dare to argue that he made it harder for other talented directors to get on the big screen, because the box will be forever remembered as the biggest flop ever!

  8. There's two sides to this argument, and neither is wrong. Moon is my film of the year, but it did'nt make money either. I will say that in a world where movies like GI Joe and Transformers make hundreds of million dollars, despite being trash, we're lucky films like The Box do get funding. Production companies do have to take risks on movies that are different, because for every $30m failure like The Box, there's a $30m success story like District 9.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Exit mobile version