class=”alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-68456″ title=”Avatar” src=”https://www.heyuguys.com/images/2011/01/Avatar-220×150.jpg” alt=”” width=”220″ height=”150″ />In an interview with the Associated Press earlier today, Michelle Rodriguez said that she’d heard that the sequel to the biggest movie of all time (that would be James Cameron’s Avatar) with the working title, Avatar 2, would take place underwater and would be ‘extraordinary beautiful’. She went on to say that she had no idea if she’s be back to player her role as Trudy Chacon.
I guess with Pandora explored, it might make sense for a sequel to go underwater, unlocking more creatures from the deep but surely we’ve only scratched the surface of the planet? No doubt more speculation will come until we actually get to see it! Let’s just hope it’s better than Sanctum!
Rodriguez is currently on the junket train for her new movie, Battle: Los Angeles so I expect she’ll get quizzed on this over the next week or 2.Would love to know your thoughts in the comments section below.
More as we get it.
What would be the best way for me to point out spelling/grammatical errors? I don’t like to do in a comment, it’s too public. I’ve been noticing a lot of these mistakes on HUG recently and it’s starting to annoy me a bit.
*yes I missed out an “it” in there…
There were some details of this back in September –
Interesting idea even if it is a tad insane!
Apologies Mark. No excuse but it’s 1.30 in the morning but we shouldn’t be making mistakes like that. Your comment is enough to make me want to do better.
Dave
Good stuff Dave. I wasn’t trying to be harsh, just giving you a bit of a kick up the back-side 🙂
I think you’re advancing too fast by going straight for the underwater angle. Yes, its an easy sequel because its going to be different while keeping the same vibrant feel of the first. We still have a lot left of Pandora to explore, there were hints of new places to go in the first and I would love to see them flesh out the above ground world before going sub terrain.